Please provide proof of backtrack. Of course sex is not the most important thing in life. Important things include a good job, family etc. The campaign you’re referring to has nothing to do with me, I’m not a part of it. And I don’t force people to agree with me, unless you can prove to the contrary. Sex is more complicated than you’re making it out to me, I did not state that chromosomal sex can change. I have engaged with facts, reason, evidence and logic. I would never assert something without primary evidence, my job depends on it. Ideology doesn’t stand up in a court of law. Just because “our jurisdictions share a common law, and when it comes to civil litigation in novel areas of dispute we do consider decisions made in each other’s jurisdictions”, it doesn’t mean that your ideologically-based prediction is guaranteed. RCHM’s approach doesn’t fail on the issue of consent, it’s law 101. In fact, RCHM’s practices satisfy the required elements. Are you a spokeswoman for a government department/agency?