--

Nitpicking in the form of political correctness is usually a sign of someone running out of arguments. You knew what I meant by intersex (which isn’t politically correct or incorrect), and I knew what you meant by your idea of “proper terminology”. What’s the argument anyway? The people you supposedly represent are free to agree or disagree with me, it’s neither here nor there. If they want to believe that I’m using them, then that’s fine, because I disagree: I am not using intersex people as far as I’m concerned. Perhaps you’re using them as an anti-trans political tool. Feel free to disagree with me anyway. I too won’t have my medical condition misrepresented by your ideology. I won’t allow your attempts to distress or insult me to affect me. Easter is coming up, after all.

Yes, there are two general categories of sexes, and there are variations within both and between both sexes. How would you categorise XXY for example? It’s not XX, nor is it XY, so what do you think it is? No offence, but I think it’s boring that you continue to state factually untrue ideological dogma.

--

--

Dana Pham CPHR (pronouns: who/cares)
Dana Pham CPHR (pronouns: who/cares)

Written by Dana Pham CPHR (pronouns: who/cares)

Trans-inclusionary radical feminist (TIRF) | Liberal Arts phenomenologist from @notredameaus | Anglo-catholic 🇦🇺 | all opinions expressed here are my own

No responses yet