Monarchists accuse republicans of misinformation


“Republicans erroneously claim that “we now have a King we didn’t choose as Australians, a King that has nowhere near the level of support that his mother had, and someone who’s not fit to be Australia’s head of state.” (ABC News 24/9/22)

What utter rot. If this is all the republicans can say, it’s time they packed their bags and went away instead of wasting the people’s time with this nonsense. They purposefully forget that the Australian people voted in 1999 to retain our system of constitutional monarchy and voted against a republic. The system of constitutional monarchy at the time comprised The Queen and her heirs and successors. Her heir and successor being Prince, now King Charles. It is totally erroneous therefore to claim that the people didn’t choose King Charles. They not only voted to retain the Queen, but they also voted to retain the continuation of the monarchy, which means King Charles.

They also wrongly state that King Charles is “not fit to be Australia’s head of state.” Republicans know full well that the Australian Constitution does not mention the term, “head of state’ because that terminology came much later when republicans began to be formed in Europe and later around the world. It means the Head of The State and in Australian terminology that means the Governor-General who assumes that position upon appointment by the King as his representative in Australia.

For decades the Australian Republican Movement have said that they intend to strongly campaign for a republic when the Queen’s reign ends. That time is now upon us, and thus it is their responsibility to tell us why Australia should become a republic.

They don’t because they know full well that there is nothing wrong with our current system of Constitutional Monarchy. They attack the new King and not the system because they know there is nothing wrong with it. They also know that out of the world’s top five democracies, four are Constitutional Monarchies. (2020 Economist Democracy Index). They know that over 60% of Australians, particularly women, support the monarchy with King Charles III as monarch (Roy Morgan Poll, 12 September 2022). They attack the King because they can’t fault the system.

If republicans were serious about promoting a republic instead of throwing hate-insults at the monarchy, they should rather tell us how the people will fare better under a republic — and be totally truthful about it, if they can, instead of publishing meaningless semantics, misinformation and outright lies.


Australian Monarchist League

Earlier Media Release: Are We on the Verge of Anarchy?

“The pledge of allegiance was included in the Australian Constitution by our Founding Fathers for the specific purpose of ensuring that members of the Australian parliament accepted and were loyal to the Australian Constitution, the Australian system of governance and the Rule of Law. The pledge, whether by oath or by affirmation, is taken by MPs and Senators following their election or re-election to the Parliament. It is a pledge that binds them for life and can only be removed by the sovereign.

The pledge of allegiance is also to guarantee the future conduct of parliamentarians binding them to serve the people of Australia in accordance with the Constitution. A member or senator cannot pick and choose what clauses of the Constitution they want to accept or reject. They are in the parliament by right of the Constitution and by vote of the people to serve Australia and not their own interests, likes or dislikes.

However, the pledge is valid so long as those taking it accept that they are bound by what they have sworn or affirmed. In the event a person indicates that he or she is not binding himself or herself by taking the pledge then it is arguable whether he or she has actually made the pledge at all.

The actions of Lidia Thorpe and the acceptance of her insult not just to the Queen but to the Constitution, the Crown and the parliament itself, not only by the officers of the Senate but, apparently by the majority of senators, with the comment called out by a member of the front bench “None of us like it”, is indicative of a parliament on the verge of anarchy. If parliamentarians openly disavow the allegiance they must constitutionally take, then they are in a state of lawlessness.

This is not a republic v monarchy issue and is even beyond a matter of individual integrity for we are looking at an attack on the fundamental basis of our constitutional system of governance and the Rule of Law.

If the majority of elected members of the Parliament reject the Australian Constitution because it is based on the Crown, there are lawful means of amending it by a referendum of the people. No member or senator has any right to bypass the will of the people.

We are supposed to be a democracy of the people, by the people and for the people never, ever for the politicians. They have no right to do as they wish and the officers of the parliament should bind them to the strict requirements of the Constitution.

The fact that the antics of Lidia Thorpe and the virtual rejection of the allegiance by a member of the front bench being allowed and even encouraged is indicative of a state of lawlessness and, as I have said, even anarchy.


Australian Monarchist League



Trans ⚧️ and Anglo-catholic ✝️ | Liberal Arts student @notredameaus | phenomenologist | social media content curator | all opinions expressed here are my own

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Dana Pham

Trans ⚧️ and Anglo-catholic ✝️ | Liberal Arts student @notredameaus | phenomenologist | social media content curator | all opinions expressed here are my own