Fallacies in Reasoning

When someone:

  • engages in faulty generalisations (confusing ‘some’ with ‘all’) or oversimplification
  • misunderstands cause and effect (post hoc ergo propter hoc)
  • uses tautology (saying the same thing twice)
  • uses false analogy
  • uses non-sequitur (‘it does not follow’)
  • attacks a person or a person’s background, instead of the person’s ideas (ad hominem)
  • uses slippery slope reasoning
  • reflects a search for perfect solutions
  • equivocates
  • inappropriately appeals to common opinion (ad populum)
  • appeals to questionable authority
  • appeals to emotions
  • attacks a straw person
  • presents a faulty/false dilemma (either/or)
  • engages in wishful thinking
  • explains by naming
  • diverts attention from the issue (eg ignoring the question)
  • distracts with glittering generalities
  • begs the question (sleight of hand)

--

--

Dana Pham (pronouns: who/cares)

Trans-inclusionary radical feminist (TIRF) | Liberal Arts phenomenologist from @notredameaus | Anglo-catholic | all opinions expressed here are my own